free online chess game

Free Online Chess Game

Classify and you will unmask!
Crazy name, real passions
[ Sign up | Log in | Guest ] (beta)
chess102 45 ( +1 | -1 )
analyze [Event "ICC 5 0"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2003.10.15"]
[Round "-"]
[White "chess106"]
[Black "just64"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ICCResult "Black resigns"]
[WhiteElo "1882"]
[BlackElo "1760"]
[Opening "Caro-Kann: advance variation"]
[ECO "B12"]
[NIC "CK.04"]
[Time "02:15:22"]
[TimeControl "300+0"]

1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 Bf5 4. Nc3 e6 5. Nf3 Nd7 6. Bd3 Bxd3 7. cxd3 c5 8.
O-O cxd4 9. Nxd4 Nxe5 10. f4 Nc6 11. Nxc6 bxc6 12. Re1 Nf6 13. f5 Qb6+ 14.
Kh1 Kd7 15. fxe6+ fxe6 16. h3 Bc5 17. Na4 Qb5 18. Nxc5+ Qxc5 19. Qe2 Rae8
20. Be3 Qd6 21. Bxa7 c5 22. d4 c4 23. Bc5 Qa6 24. Qe5 Rhg8 25. b4 Ne4 26. b5
Qa5 27. Rxe4 dxe4 28. Qd6+ Kc8 29. Bb6 {Black resigns} 1-0
jeffz_2002 2 ( +1 | -1 )
Not even a "please"?
chess102 5 ( +1 | -1 )
i didn't know what to say so i said nothing
jeffz_2002 47 ( +1 | -1 )
Just a few ideas ... Your request could include any of the following:

1. Why you're requesting analysis (e.g., "I can't figure out where I went wrong", or "What should I have done here?", or simply, "I'm interested in your comments")
2. Your own analysis of the game
3. References to previously played games that are similar
4. A please! Not trying to be funny, but you're asking other people to invest their time on your behalf, and it doesn't hurt to be appropriately polite.

Good luck! Jeff
caldazar 30 ( +1 | -1 )
Well, while I'm always up for a bit of analysis now and again, the posted game appears to be a blitz game. I've always personally found it a bit silly to annotate a game where just the preliminary analysis takes longer to finish than the time the players spent actually playing the game.
jthorp 125 ( +1 | -1 )
Here's what Fritz 8 thought... (1) chess106 (1882) - just64 (1760) [B12]
ICC 5 0 Internet Chess Club, 15.10.2003
[Fritz 8 (30s)]

B12: Caro-Kann: Advance Variation 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 Bf5 4.Nc3 e6 5.Nf3 Nd7 [5...Bb4 6.Be2 Ne7 7.0-0 0-0 8.Nh4 c5 9.Bg5 Bg6 10.Nxg6 hxg6 11.a3 Bxc3 12.bxc3 Nbc6 13.h4 Qa5 14.Qd3 cxd4 15.cxd4 Nf5 16.c3 f6 17.exf6 gxf6 18.Bh6 Rf7 19.g3 Nxh6 20.Qxg6+ Fogarasi,T-Vadasz,L/Budapest 2000/CBM 77 ext/0-1 (30); 5...c5 6.Bb5+ Nc6 7.0-0 Qc7 8.Nh4 Bg6 9.Bg5 a6 10.Bxc6+ Qxc6 11.Re1 Ne7 12.dxc5 Qxc5 13.Nxg6 hxg6 14.Na4 Qc6 15.c4 dxc4 16.Rc1 b5 17.Nc3 Rd8 18.Qe2 Rd7 19.Rcd1 Nd5 20.Nxd5 Henebry,M-Jabali,R/Los Angeles 2001/CBM 85 ext/0-1 (39)] 6.Bd3N [6.Be2 c5 7.Be3 Ne7 8.dxc5 Nc6 9.Nd4 Bg6 10.Bb5 Qc7 11.Na4 Be7 12.f4 Be4 13.0-0 g6 14.Bxc6 bxc6 15.b4 Rb8 16.a3 a5 17.Qd2 axb4 18.axb4 h5 19.Nc3 Bf5 20.Nxf5 gxf5 Janturin,A-Durakovic,A/Litohoto 1999/CBM 72 ext/1-0 (24)] 6...Bxd3 7.cxd3 c5 Black undermines the pawn chain [7...Ne7 8.0-0=] 8.0-0 cxd4 9.Nxd4 Nxe5 10.f4 [10.Ncb5!? Nc6 11.Bf4 Nxd4 12.Nxd4=] 10...Nc6 11.Nxc6 bxc6 12.Re1 [12.f5 Qb6+ 13.Kh1 e5=/+] 12...Nf6 13.f5 Qb6+ [13...Bd6 14.fxe6 0-0 15.exf7+ Rxf7 16.d4-/+] 14.Kh1 Kd7 [>=14...Bd6!? must be considered 15.Bg5 e5=/+] 15.fxe6+ fxe6 16.h3 Controls g4 [16.Qe2 Re8+/=] 16...Bc5 [16...Bd6!?= has some apparent merit] 17.Na4 Qb5 18.Nxc5+ Qxc5 19.Qe2 [19.Bf4 Rhf8+/-] 19...Rae8 [19...Qd6 20.Be3+/=] 20.Be3 [20.Bf4 Qb6+/-] 20...Qd6 [20...d4!? is an interesting alternative 21.Bf4 e5+/=] 21.Bxa7+/- c5 22.d4 [22.Rac1!? Rc8 23.Qe3+-] 22...c4 This push gains space [22...Ne4 23.Qc2 cxd4 24.Bxd4+/=] 23.Bc5+/- White can be proud of that piece 23...Qa6 [23...Qg3 24.Qf1+/-] 24.Qe5 Rhg8 [24...Kc8 25.b3+/-] 25.b4 Ne4?? cause more grief [25...Qc6 26.a4+/-] 26.b5 [>=26.Rxe4 and White can already relax 26...Kc8 27.Rf1+-] 26...Qa5?? sad, but how else could Black save the game? [>=26...Qb7 27.Rxe4 dxe4+-] 27.Rxe4 [>=27.b6 seems even better 27...Qxb6 28.Bxb6+-] 27...dxe4 [27...Qc7 28.Rf1 Qxe5 29.Rf7+ Kc8 30.Rxe5 Rd8 31.Rxe6 Rd7 32.Rc6+ Kd8 33.Bb6+ Ke8+-] 28.Qd6+ Kc8 29.Bb6 [29.Bb6 Qxb6 30.Qxb6+-; 29.b6 Qxb6 30.Bxb6 Kb7 31.Qd7+ Ka6 32.Qa7+ Kb5 33.Rb1+ Kc6 34.Qc7+ Kd5 35.Rb5#] 1-0